Are you blogging more and enjoying it less?
Or blogging less and enjoying it more?
Do you love Freeview?
Kelloggs, anyone?
Thought so.
28 June 2011
24 June 2011
all the leaves are
Although I first read about them some years ago, I have just discovered the Decemberists. Calloo callay.
22 June 2011
smokie
I had an idea for a TV advertisement. The purpose of the advertisement would be to inform people about the costs to the healthcare system of people who get sick - and when I say sick, I mean fixin' to die sick - from smoking. Maybe if people realised the impost on their taxes through the healthcare system, there would be more of a mass movement to reduce the incidence of smoking throughout the population.
I would use the notion of an old fashioned nanny. That is to say, an older, larger, warmer, in a dress and pinafore nanny, the style of nanny you think of when you maybe think about the upbringing of the privileged scions of earlier generations. I believe there is an alternate image of nannies based on some recent, populist notion of them being strict and harsh. Probably a short term ratings winner but no resonance, you know what I mean?
The nanny would be all soft and comforting, you know, and would say that if you really understood the social and financial burden that your smoking brought on the whole population, including your city, your neighbourhood, your workmates, your friends, your family, yourself, you'd reconsider the habit.
The language would be as one would use to a child to get him or her to modify behaviour that they know is unhelpful, but just need a push. The tone would be uplifting and hopeful to insinuate that, with your help, we'll all be better off.
What do you reckon?
I would use the notion of an old fashioned nanny. That is to say, an older, larger, warmer, in a dress and pinafore nanny, the style of nanny you think of when you maybe think about the upbringing of the privileged scions of earlier generations. I believe there is an alternate image of nannies based on some recent, populist notion of them being strict and harsh. Probably a short term ratings winner but no resonance, you know what I mean?
The nanny would be all soft and comforting, you know, and would say that if you really understood the social and financial burden that your smoking brought on the whole population, including your city, your neighbourhood, your workmates, your friends, your family, yourself, you'd reconsider the habit.
The language would be as one would use to a child to get him or her to modify behaviour that they know is unhelpful, but just need a push. The tone would be uplifting and hopeful to insinuate that, with your help, we'll all be better off.
What do you reckon?
19 June 2011
18 June 2011
ub (bs) 40
So I'm browsing one of my favourite time-wasters, Listopia, and I run across this.
"WTF?" I think to myself because, as you know, most thinking is mainly internal or, as some would have it, mental.
So I'm mentally thinking to myself about wtf is this so I have to google it and I get there. For reasons that are usually described as "unaccountable", which is in fact a euphemism for "wtf?", I decide to look at the one which "explains" the strip, rather than the strip itself.
Here is a random selection of one, I now bid you bye-bye for some two to three months.
I just love the deadpan reconstruction of the strip which is mimicked totally by the commenters. One can only marvel in the fact that there are squillions of people out there doing this sort of stuff, when in point of fact most of them should be heavily sedated and kept in lion cages.
With lions.
Anyway, I now know about ubbs.
"WTF?" I think to myself because, as you know, most thinking is mainly internal or, as some would have it, mental.
So I'm mentally thinking to myself about wtf is this so I have to google it and I get there. For reasons that are usually described as "unaccountable", which is in fact a euphemism for "wtf?", I decide to look at the one which "explains" the strip, rather than the strip itself.
Here is a random selection of one, I now bid you bye-bye for some two to three months.
I just love the deadpan reconstruction of the strip which is mimicked totally by the commenters. One can only marvel in the fact that there are squillions of people out there doing this sort of stuff, when in point of fact most of them should be heavily sedated and kept in lion cages.
With lions.
Anyway, I now know about ubbs.
Labels:
blogging,
hours of fun,
idiocy,
just plan weird;,
supposed to be funny
05 June 2011
complicated
Appropos of absolutely nothing at all, I had a random thought about quite common phrase. So I looked it up on Wikipedia and this is what I found:
Lovers of 60s and 70s pop and rcok might like this one. Even though youtube shows other songs, I think they were pretty much one-hit wonders with this one.
The form without the hyphen is also commonly seen, but can beWho'd have thought it was so complicated?
construed as a "wild chase", but not an inevitably fruitless one, after a
possibly domesticated and flightless goose, rather than after a wild
goose.
Lovers of 60s and 70s pop and rcok might like this one. Even though youtube shows other songs, I think they were pretty much one-hit wonders with this one.
03 June 2011
deja vu
Sometime back in late 2007, I wrote this:
I do believe I deserve a pat on the back for prescience.
And a boot up the clacker for smartarsery.
But it's a shame that it turned out to be so close.
"they might turn out to be incompetent but at least they won't be bastards"
I do believe I deserve a pat on the back for prescience.
And a boot up the clacker for smartarsery.
But it's a shame that it turned out to be so close.
Labels:
australia,
inside the machine,
politics,
reflection,
wrong wrong wrong
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)